Comment of the judgment of European Court of Justice of 23 March 2010, in cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08, concerning the interpretation of Articles: 5.1 a) and b) and 5.2 of Directive 89/104/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, 9.1 c) of Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and, 14 Directive 2000/31 / EC on electronic commerce.
Special comparative analysis of the judgment of the ECJ in previous questions, in the case called GOOGLE FRANCE, in contrast to the solutions proposed by the Advocate General, in its conclusions of 22 September 2009.
